Content Writer
Digital Marketing | DV360
Stop wasting impressions on users who have already ignored your...
By Vanshaj Sharma
Feb 16, 2026 | 5 Minutes | |
You know what kills programmatic campaigns faster than anything else? Wasting impressions on the same person who already ignored your ad five times. That exactly what happens when you skip frequency capping in DV360.
Most media buyers treat frequency capping like an afterthought. They set up their campaigns, configure targeting, upload creatives, then slap on some arbitrary frequency cap at the end. Big mistake. When done right, frequency capping doesn't just prevent ad fatigue. It directly lowers your CPM while improving campaign performance across the board.
The math here is simple but powerful. Every time you show an ad to someone who has already seen it multiple times, you're paying premium rates for diminishing returns. That person isn't suddenly going to convert on impression number seven when they didn't bite on impressions one through six. You're just burning budget.
Here something that surprises newer advertisers. DV360 auctions work on a second price model with lots of competing demand. When you let your frequency run wild, you end up bidding against yourself in subsequent auctions. The platform sees your campaign as having high demand for that specific user, which drives up the clearing price you actually pay.
Think about it from the supply side too. Publishers love high frequency campaigns because they can sell the same inventory multiple times to the same advertiser. That free money for them. But it terrible for you because you're essentially subsidizing inefficiency.
The sweet spot for most campaigns sits between 3 to 5 impressions per user per week. Below that, you might not achieve proper message reinforcement. Above that, you're entering diminishing returns territory where each additional impression costs more but converts less.
DV360 gives you flexibility with frequency capping, but that flexibility becomes a trap if you don't know what you're doing. The platform lets you set caps at multiple levels: campaign, insertion order, line item. Each serves a different purpose.
Campaign level caps work best for brand awareness plays where you want to control overall exposure across all your line items. If you're running a major product launch with multiple creative variations, a campaign cap of 10 impressions per week keeps you from overwhelming the same users regardless of which line item serves the ad.
Line item caps make more sense for performance campaigns. You might run separate line items for prospecting versus retargeting. Your retargeting line item could have a tighter frequency cap since those users already know your brand. Prospecting might need slightly more exposure to break through the noise.
The time window matters just as much as the number. Weekly caps usually outperform daily caps because they account for natural browsing patterns. Someone who sees your ad Monday morning might not be ready to convert until Friday afternoon. A daily cap of 2 impressions might reset before you get that conversion opportunity.
This is where things get interesting. When you implement proper frequency capping, your average CPM typically drops by 15 to 30 percent within the first week. Why? Because you're suddenly competing in less saturated auctions.
Without caps, DV360 keeps targeting the same high intent users who match your audience criteria perfectly. Everyone wants those users. Competition is fierce. CPMs skyrocket. With caps in place, your campaign spreads across more users. Some of those users exist in lower competition segments where CPMs are cheaper.
You also avoid the "frequency penalty" that many exchanges now implement. Google Ad Manager and other supply sources have started charging higher rates for high frequency impressions. They do this to protect user experience. Your fifth impression on the same user might cost 40 percent more than your first impression, even in the same auction environment.
Smart advertisers use this to their advantage. They set aggressive frequency caps, knowing their campaigns will automatically shift toward cheaper inventory. The performance might take a small hit initially, but the cost savings more than compensate. Your cost per acquisition often improves even if your conversion rate dips slightly.
Stop copying frequency caps from blog posts or case studies. Every campaign needs its own testing approach. Start with a baseline cap of 4 impressions per week at the line item level. Run that for two weeks while monitoring three key metrics: average frequency, CPM trends and conversion rate.
If your average frequency sits below 3, you set the cap too high. Users aren't seeing enough exposures before converting. Lower the cap to 3 impressions per week and watch what happens. Conversely, if you're hitting the cap ceiling with frequency at exactly 4, you might benefit from loosening it to 5 or 6.
The conversion rate tells you whether frequency drives results or just wastes money. Pull a frequency report from DV360 that shows conversions by exposure number. If most conversions happen at impression 2 or 3, you know exposures beyond that point deliver minimal value. Tighten your cap accordingly.
CPM is your reality check. If frequency caps make your CPM drop but conversions fall off a cliff, you went too aggressive. Find the balance where CPM decreases without killing performance. That balance point differs for every vertical, audience and campaign objective.
Once you nail basic frequency capping, you can layer in more sophisticated approaches. Cross device frequency capping matters now more than ever. Users bounce between phones, tablets and desktops constantly. Without cross device capping, your 3 impression weekly limit becomes 9 impressions (3 per device). DV360 supports this natively, but you need to enable it explicitly in campaign settings.
Dayparting plus frequency capping creates powerful combinations. Maybe you want higher frequency during evening hours when conversion rates peak, but lower frequency during morning commutes when people just scroll mindlessly. Set different line items with different frequency caps for different dayparts. The complexity pays off in efficiency.
Creative rotation matters too. If someone sees the same creative three times, ad blindness sets in faster than if they see three different variations. Use DV360 creative rotation settings alongside frequency caps. Show creative A on impression one, creative B on impression two, creative C on impression three. This approach extends effective frequency before hitting diminishing returns.
Campaigns with optimized frequency capping typically see CPM reductions between 18 to 35 percent compared to uncapped campaigns in the same verticals. The exact savings depend on how competitive your targeting is. Niche B2B audiences see bigger drops than broad consumer audiences because the competition for repeat impressions is more intense in smaller pools.
Your quality score improves too. Google algorithms factor in user experience signals. High frequency campaigns generate negative user signals like hiding ads or marking them irrelevant. Lower frequency means better user reception, which feeds back into auction favorability. You pay less per impression and get preferential treatment in future auctions.
The real magic happens when you combine frequency capping with other DV360 features. Smart bidding algorithms work better when they're not constantly rebidding on the same users. Audience expansion finds better prospects when it isn't trapped in high frequency loops. Everything in your campaign ecosystem performs better once frequency is under control.
You don't need revolutionary tactics or secret strategies. Just implement sensible frequency caps, test methodically and watch your CPMs drop while your efficiency climbs. That how frequency capping reduces CPM in DV360 without sacrificing the results that actually matter.